🎉 Announcing Baserow 2.1: Expert formula mode, infrastructure upgrades, and improved maintainability!

We’re excited to share our latest release! :rocket:

Baserow 2.1 is a maintenance-focused update that improves performance, security, and long-term stability, while also introducing expert formula mode.

Here’s what’s new:

→ Expert formula mode: Combine data, functions, and operators across Applications, Automations, and AI fields
→ Infrastructure upgrades: Migration to Nuxt 3 and Django backend upgrade
→ Smaller & faster Docker images: Improved production efficiency for self-hosted deployments
→ PostgreSQL update: PostgreSQL 13 is no longer supported (upgrade to 14+)
→ New Ukrainian translation thanks to @dospolov :ukraine:

:rocket: See what’s new in Baserow 2.1

We’re continuously improving Baserow based on your feedback. Try the new release and let us know what you think! :light_bulb:

8 Likes

Is there a way to downgrade the Docker AIO back to version 2.0.1? The 2.1 update broke my application and I don’t have time to research why at the moment.

When clicking a button that does a bunch of actions, I get an error when it gets to the step “Add a row” with one of the fields empty (it’s an optional field).

Invalid form

The “Create a row” action failed: One or more fields contain invalid values.

Value error for field “\[optional field here\]“: None is not a valid number

Hello @walden :wave:

Yes, downgrading is possible. However, we recommend rolling back to version 2.0.6 rather than 2.0.1.

To do this, you can follow the same process as when upgrading:

  1. Stop your Docker all-in-one container.
  2. Change the image version to 2.0.6.
  3. Start the container again.

Thank you! It wasn’t working but after looking at the logs I saw Redis was the problem. I renamed the file inside the Redis folder so it would be recreated, and all is well now. Running 2.0.6.

1 Like

Hello, we are facing the same problem as walden since the release of 2.1 (Saas mode).

I ve created a topic about it :

Hey @Edouard, thanks for pointing this out! As discussed in the :backhand_index_pointing_up: topic, a fix for this bug is on the way. :slightly_smiling_face:

My problem is resolved with subsequent updates (2.1.3 at the time of this comment). Thanks!

2 Likes